Home » Xpressions
Category:

Xpressions

Gifts From a Feral Cat

by A Friend

Celebrations to Friend in The Way, Tian Wilson on the publishing of her new book!

In this gem of a tale, Tian shares her personal story about a scrappy black cat with a mysterious knack for connecting people and lessons in the magic of hózhó(living in beauty)…valuable lessons for perhaps all of us.

The book is available from Amazon.com in paperback and Kindle format: https://www.amazon.com/Gifts-Feral-Cat-Story-Miracles/dp/B0BMSVSNCB

A True Story…

The old adage, “When a student is ready, the teacher appears,” doesn’t say teachers are limited to the two-legged.

In 1989 a single woman and her two cats moved to a small town in New Mexico. She was seeking peace, answers, and perhaps redemption. And a new understanding of Life. On Thanksgiving morning, what would turn out to be a mentor, healer, and friend arrived at her home in the most unlikely of forms: an ugly, beat-up feral cat.

Thus begins an intimate and uplifting story about the power of Love. Over the span of a year, she and her friends experience profound life lessons in tandem with personal transformation. As they discover the richness of wisdom in friendship and community, the strange cat leads them on a journey of discovery…and miracles.

Tian met Dr. Bob in 1976 and has been passing along blessings ever since. Today she plays the roles of business and life coach, author, and loving shepherd of cats.

0 comment
FacebookTwitterPinterestTumblrEmail

There is an old Taoist story that often comes to mind these days. I described it in another article some time ago, but if you aren’t familiar with it, it goes something like this…

A farmer was working in a field one day when a wild, but docile horse appeared. He approached the horse and brought it into his stable.

When he shared the news with his neighbors, everyone was delighted and said how good that was. As a simple man, the farmer shrugged his shoulders and stated he didn’t know much about ‘good and bad,’ but was thankful for the new horse.

A few weeks later, the horse escaped the farmer’s field and ran off. When the news broke out, everyone was dismayed and said how unfortunate that was. Again, the farmer said he didn’t know much about ‘fortune or misfortune,’ and quietly went back to work in the field.

Then, a few days later, the horse returned grazing with a group of horses, and the man’s stable multiplied. Surprised by this turn of events, everyone remarked at how great that was.

As the man’s son was riding later that week, he was thrown from the horse and broke his leg. Everyone was upset and said how terrible that was. The farmer just shrugged his shoulders and went home to tend his son.

Shortly later, the King’s army came through conscripting all able young men for a war. But seeing the man’s son limping on a splinted leg, they passed him over and moved onto the next village.

And so the story continues…

The moral of the ‘Farmer and Horse’ parable seemed quite relevant when reflecting on a different story this week—the tale of the Farmer’s Apprentice and Utopia Academy. It goes something like this…

Once upon a time, a consultant and business owner had grown restless in his position. In his heart, he was a farmer’s apprentice and occasionally dreamed of shedding his fancy title in favor of a simpler life and freedom to focus on his occupational passion without the complexities of business. So one day, the consultant shared this secret desire with a friend, another farmer’s apprentice, who offered an encouraging statement of wisdom: “It’s all right also should you decide you don’t want to play that role any longer.”

The consultant already knew those words were true, yet felt trapped in his role due to business entanglements, commitments, and his role as the breadwinner of his family. In his mind, exiting this role for another would require a surprise opportunity outside of foresee—a gift of grace. He was concerned that shedding his role for a new one without a perfect alignment of stars would result in painful consequences for a number of people.

As he contemplated the friend’s words during the following week, a special gift arrived initiating a new lesson in farming.

He received a message from a recruiter inviting him to apply for a position as the Senior Stuff Manager for Utopia Academy, a new foundation created for building hundreds of special schools in under-served communities. He had received similar messages from recruiters in the past, but this one was different. Something about it seemed uniquely appealing on many levels.

The mission of the organization sounded simply beautiful. And the idea of designing and nurturing a stuff program for schools from a blank canvas was very exciting. As a foundation capitalized with the kind of money only possessed by billionaires, they have the opportunity to do stuff-related things that are often impossible in other schools due to politics or budget constraints.

As for qualifications and job responsibilities, he seemed like a “perfect” match! As a result of his history as a consultant, he had considerable experience designing solutions for the types of growth challenges Utopia Academy was going to face. It was the type of work he loves most (designing stuff programs to address complex challenges) and does very well.

And the compensation and benefits they offered were nothing to ignore. His role over the years as a consultant and business owner hadn’t been as financially beneficial as his title and status might suggest. And challenges in recent years had strained his finances further resulting in a number of sacrifices and questions about funding his children’s education. When calculated, the pay offered by Utopia Academy would remedy those matters completely!

What an amazing opportunity—an “ideal” job, with an “ideal” organization, offering “ideal” compensation, for which he was “ideally” qualified! As a student of farming, he pondered, “Could this be a glorious herd of champion horses arriving at the stable?”

And so he applied and cruised effortlessly through the selection process over a period of weeks. In the meantime, other stars seemed to come into alignment. Hank, one of his old team members, rejoined his company and alleviated concern about leaving his business partner with a critical void after his departure. So he started training Hank in preparation for a possible exit. Then some new projects emerged, “ideal” opportunities (perfectly sized and diverse) for training Hank and other team mates. And best of all, when he described several preexisting commitments scheduled into the new employment period (and wish to fulfill those obligations for the benefit of many), Utopia Academy viewed his intention as a favorable demonstration of character and integrity. What more could he ask? Just simply “ideal” in every way!

And so he arrived at the week of final interviews. Out of more than a hundred applicants, it was now down to him and one other contender. Although he sensed a ‘cosmic humor’ in the “ideal” nature of events to this stage, the funniest of all occurred as he sat for his first live interview. As his new boss appeared, he almost spit his coffee out when he saw her. She was a breathtaking example of his “Perfectly Attractive Woman”—long, soft dark hair with a face that could ‘launch a 1,000 ships’ (complete with a perfect birthmark near her lip). Oh, this “ideal” thing just doesn’t stop!!!

And so the interviews went quite well. Maybe even, “ideally.” And then it was time for Utopia Academy to make the big decision.

Throughout most of the process, the consultant, who aims to be a farmer, felt rather free with whatever result may come. Yea or nay, either way was okay. But something began stirring as he waited for Utopia Academy’s final decision. A sense of hope, anticipation, and enthusiastic importance started welling up.

Then after four long days, he got the big phone call. And the “ideal” organization offering the “ideal” job for the “ideal” candidate, decided the other candidate was “more ideal.”

And boy oh boy, did a feeling of disappointment well up in magnitude that he hadn’t felt in a very long time! Although he suspected early in this affair there was an obvious lesson at play, he had bitten the apple of temptation nevertheless. And now a parade of Not-I’s, complete with floats and a drum band, marched through the street of Awareness for a good day or two.

Watch. Watch. Watch. And then peace. Not-I’s begin yelling! Watch. Watch. Watch. Peace. Not-I’s kick and scream! Watch. Watch. Watch. Freedom returns.

Play Video

After a few days, he woke up with a smile. And a consultant, who aims to be a farmer, was deeply thankful for a valuable lesson about the seduction of ideals and the unpredictability of horses.

Sometimes horses come, and sometimes they go. And sometimes they run away just as they seem to be entering the stable. That’s simply what horses do.

And it’s never the end of the story.

Despite our tendency to think of personal life experience as partitioned stories, it is truly all one inseparable event. Every moment we presently experience is the result of all preceding occurrence— every so-called “challenge,” “blessing,” and even the most seemingly inconsequential events. When we truly discover that nothing is separate – only changes in perceived circumstance in a dynamic field of experience – everything is recognized as a gift.

Thank “X” for school lessons taught by Utopia Academy and all those beautiful, unpredictable horses!

0 comment
FacebookTwitterPinterestTumblrEmail

In 2019, I shared a talk introducing Dr. Bob’s Picture of Man (POM) and Picture of Conditioned Man (POCM) to an audience at SAND19. For those unfamiliar with the conference, the SAND (Science and Non-Duality) organization hosts events every year providing a forum for sharing ideas with focus on non-duality. The SAND community is an delightful mix of spiritual teachers and students, philosophers, artists, physicists, cognitive scientists, and others—lot’s of unique voices all expressing a shared truth.

I hadn’t looked at that talk in some time. After discussing it with a friend recently, I revisited the presentation and spent a little time word smithing and updating the imagery. It’s posted below as a PDF for anyone interested.

The Fall of Man parable as used in the talk inspired the theme for this web site. Although discussion about Conditioned Man is adapted into symbology of the Garden story, the POM and teaching ideas are directly traced to Dr. Bob’s Science of Man.

0 comment
FacebookTwitterPinterestTumblrEmail

A Special Invitation to Gogo

by A Friend

Life delivers invitations in many ways. Sometimes bluntly through dervishes in coffee shops. And other times through more subtle means.

Have you received an invitation too?

Or is it possibly waiting to be found in a busy stack of mail?

Play Video

The poem at the beginning of the video is by J. Rumi. The clip afterward is from the 1979 movie adaptation of G.I. Gurdjieff’s book, “Meetings With Remarkable Men.”

1 comment
FacebookTwitterPinterestTumblrEmail

All spiritual work, regardless of form and method of teaching, aims toward a process of releasing attachment to illusion and remembering our true nature. In the Fourth Way tradition, this process is called Self-Remembering. Rupert Spira expresses this concept using the allegory of an amnesiac actor awakening to discover he is not the role he plays on stage as King Lear.

In the opening lines of the following film, writer and producer Daniel Schmidt describes this state of amnesia using the sanskrit word, Maya:

“We are at a time in history where we have not only forgotten Samadhi, but we have forgotten what we forgot.”

“This forgetting is Maya, the illusion of the self.”

Click the play button on the image below to view the film.

Play Video

Visit awakentheworld.com to view more videographic Xpressions by Daniel.

0 comment
FacebookTwitterPinterestTumblrEmail

In the games of national security, very rarely do intelligence services have complete and empirical information about situations. And mistaken understandings from faulty intelligence collection or analysis often result in costly and dangerous consequences. History is filled with examples of such intelligence errors including assumptions about Iraq’s role in the 9/11 attacks and WMD capabilities, Japanese naval activity before Pearl Harbor, and many others.

Intelligence services dedicate tremendous effort to reduce these errors by collecting information through multiple means when possible, careful vetting of sources, and using highly structured approaches when evaluating ambiguous and often conflicting information.

As one example of this point, intelligence analysts are trained to anticipate the influence of personal biases and the limits of collected information. And when writing reports, disciplined analysts rarely state inferences (conclusions derived from available evidence and reasoning) in absolute terms. Instead, they attribute a probability value (such as 90%, 0.9, HIGH, etc.) to describe their confidence in the accuracy of a statement.

For example, an intelligence analyst might state: “We are 90% confident that Russian military activity on the Ukrainian border indicates preparation for invasion.” Although the analyst may strongly believe this conclusion based on overwhelming evidence, the analyst admits uncertainty and presents the information accordingly.

Perhaps there’s a valuable lesson here for use in spiritual work.

Cultivating awareness of the difference between knowledge and unverified belief is a most valuable practice in the work of self-knowing.

Belief is defined as “something one accepts as true or real; a firmly held opinion or conviction.”

Knowledge is defined as “facts and information acquired through experience.”

In the previous example, the intelligence analyst’s inference about Russians on the Ukrainian border is, in principle, a statement of belief. Not knowledge. The analyst does not ‘see into the mind of Russian leaders’ or possess a crystal ball of omniscience. And the disciplined analyst reports this belief to the customer (decision-makers reading the report) by consciously acknowledging the possibility of error.

To put this idea into practice, here’s an experiment to try…

Dedicate a sheet of paper to re-evaluating beliefs and information one personally regards as knowledge. Create three columns:

  1. ”I” believe (or call knowledge)
  2. Has this belief been tested?
  3. What is “my” degree of confidence?

As an example, Craig believes Sandra loves him. He’s tested this hypothesis over the years (and maybe in more ways than one). So a confidence value of 99% is attributed to this belief. Although there’s been plenty of evidence observed during their marriage and he often feels love radiating when she looks at him, Craig doesn’t truly know what goes on in the inner experience of Sandra. So he can’t say 100%. Anything we state with 100% confidence is called knowledge (facts and information acquired directly through experience).

Likewise, Craig believes the Earth is round. He was told the Earth is round in school, watched documentaries about astronomy on TV, seen pictures from NASA, etc. There seems to be plenty of evidence to support a belief that the Earth is round. And at the same time, he has never personally viewed the Earth directly through the window of a spacecraft. Therefore, he accurately states “The Earth is round” as a confident belief. Not as a statement of knowledge.

Work with this for a bit and observe any realizations that emerge.  

Although introduced in this post as an experiment in self-knowing, it could also be regarded as an exercise in a beautiful process of liberation described in some traditions as Unknowing.

Additional Comments

Unverified belief is a proxy for knowledge. In the absence of complete knowledge about situations, we rely on belief to ‘fill the gap’ and provide context necessary for action. Although belief is essential to our functioning as humans, in our conditioned state, we often invest absolute faith in beliefs and equate them with knowledge. And this state of affairs results in a chaotic and contaminated spiritual body where illusion and falsehood are indistinguishable from truth and knowledge. And the sense of security and self-image (vanity) reinforced by rigid identification with beliefs demands vigilant defense by pride.

The purpose of this exercise is not to determine the truth or falseness of beliefs. Many beliefs are likely true. Others false. The aim of this exercise is simply to cultivate awareness of the difference between beliefs and knowledge, loosen identification with beliefs, and maybe crack open a door for new discovery.

Likewise, the confidence values we assign to beliefs are not very relevant for this experiment. Whether one is 70% or 99% confident is immaterial. Any statement with a value of confidence less than 100% is recognized as belief and disentangled from knowledge.

It’s interesting to see what may happen when one works with this experiment for a while.

Perhaps three of the most liberating words in the English language areI don’t know.”

1 comment
FacebookTwitterPinterestTumblrEmail
Gurdjieff Mechnical Fourth Way

Make Up “Your” Mind

by A Friend

As Dr. Bob explores in Lesson 1 of the Science of Man series, the first step on the path to freedom is recognizing the absence of choice in our state of being and how suggestion and circumstance dictate our emotions and behavior.

For many, pride strongly opposes this idea when first presented.The notion of being mechanically manipulated by external circumstances is a tough pill for the ego to swallow.

For others, there may be confusion between the topic of ‘choice of inner state’ and ‘choice of behavior.’ Most new students arrive at The Work with the belief they have free agency and choice of their actions. After all, “I make decisions every day.” Or so it seems that way.

If you have worked with Lesson 1’s experiment for while and have not thoroughly witnessed the mechanical nature of your inner experience, try the following as an additional exercise.

Make a conscious decision to be continuously happy for the next three days. Make up your mind that nothing or no one can push your buttons.

And as a tip, consider drawing a smiley face on the back of your hand or tying a string on your finger as a reminder. Remaining presently aware of one’s inner state and remembering “conscious decisions” are often quite challenging early in The Work.

0 comment
FacebookTwitterPinterestTumblrEmail

Some Fun At The Office

by A Friend

Although people rarely perceive anything humorous about their own conditioning, there is something often comical about conditioned behavior when we observe it without identification. And one doesn’t need to be a student of The Way to see the humor.

Take the circus as an example. At the circus, the clown’s act is often just a rowdy exaggeration of Not-I behaviors. The audience, watching the clown’s behavior as unidentified observers, can’t stop laughing as the clowns play out a comedic narrative told by bopping each other on the head and other memed demonstrations of conditioned behavior.

And the Not-I’s are great recipe ingredients for sitcoms too.

For nine seasons, the hit television show The Office entertained viewers with its humorous portrayal of the social circus inside a Scranton paper company office. The show’s success is entirely based in its comedic depiction of the Not-I’s in the interactions of the cast members.

As an exercise, watch an episode or two of The Office and make a game out of counting how many times you hear someone complaining, sticking up for rights, blaming, pleasing others as a means of manipulation, putting on a front, or appealing to an authority.

Maybe microwave some popcorn and make an evening out of it. Who says Work can’t be fun!

0 comment
FacebookTwitterPinterestTumblrEmail

As certain scientific truths have come to light, many older forms of religious expression seem no longer tenable. But, rather than lead to an increasingly secular milieu, these insights of science can clearly lead to a deepening of human spirituality.

Through a series of complex selection, this billions-of-years-old, expanding universe has evolved our human organisms to be vehicles in which it can achieve awareness. While the sentient experience certainly exists in variant degrees in other species, there is a qualitative difference in the ability of homo Sapiens to engage in, and act out of, reflective consciousness. It seems likely, this has occurred in other places in the universe, perhaps to an even greater degree, but as of yet, we know nothing of that. We only know the role we have been cast in.

To be this fulcrum, this sentient, cognitive psyche-center, in which the universe can become conscious of itself. What an august privilege, to have been given this role, and what an Atlas-like responsibility it puts on our shoulders. To maintain an appreciation of our ability to sense and reflect. Wanting to see, to hear, clearly–without blemish, without deceit. Wanting to speak words that are true. And translating this underlying sense of the whole in the simplest things we do.

This tie-in to the whole has produced in the history of our species a childlike wonderment – a sense of awe – a sense of what we call, “the sacred.”

In the course of our history, this sense of the sacred has expressed itself in various communicable insights – taking the form of religious traditions. Taoism and Zen being perhaps purer and simpler forms of such expression.

Not so simple a religious tradition is the projection of the whole in terms of a parental-type matrix– an addressable external psyche-center we’ve referred to as “deity.” Even going so far as to give this projected psyche-center attributes such as creator/designer, or even overseer.

Such a religious tradition is certainly being questioned today with our advancement in the sciences. We now know individuation only comes about through the interplay of the whole. Forms are not pre-designed, but evolve slowly in relation to their surround – making the notion of a creator/designer deity seem unnatural. And events in both planetary and human history – make the notion of a divine overseer, implausible.

And not just unnatural, not just implausible–even harmful. By postulating a transcendent all- knowing divinity, we abnegate our role in the evolution of the Universe as a here and now, individuated fulcrum of awareness.

We buy into oppressive, destructive statements like, “there is nothing new under the sun,” instead of experiencing “beginners mind” and spontaneity in seeing and hearing. We adhere to religions based on denial and immolation instead of the affirmation of life. In the social order, we lazily tout simplistic phrases like “god-given rights” and “absolute ethics” instead of working to refine our cultural mindset to actually want to afford a better life for our species and our planet.

In trying to fathom the “mind of God,” we loose direct touch with nature … with what’s really going on here.

0 comment
FacebookTwitterPinterestTumblrEmail

A short extract from The Treatise on Being attributed to Ibn ‘Arabi.

No one sees Him, except Himself; no one reaches Him, except Himself; and no one knows Him except Himself. He knows Himself through Himself and He sees Himself by means of Himself. No one but He sees Him. His very Oneness is His veil since nothing veils Him other than He; His own Being veils Him. His Oneness is concealed by His Oneness without any condition.

No one other than He sees Him. No sent prophet, nor perfect saint nor angel brought close knows Him. His prophet is He; His Messenger is He; His message is He and His word is He. He sent Himself, through Himself, from Himself to Himself; there is no intermediary or means other than He. There is no difference between the Sender, that which is sent and the one to whom it is sent. The very existence of the letters of the prophetic message is His existence. There is no other who could cease to be, or have a name or be named.

Because of this, the Prophet (may God bless him and give him peace) said, “He who knows himself, knows his Lord”. He also said, “I knew my Lord through my Lord”. What the Prophet meant by this, is that you are not you but you are He and there is no you; and it is not that He enters into you or comes out of you, or that you enter into Him or come out of Him. He did not mean that you have being and you are qualified by this or that attribute. What he meant was that you never were and that you never will be, whether through yourself, or through Him, or in Him or with Him. You have neither ceased to be nor are you existent. You are Him and He is you, without any of these imperfections. If you know your existence in this way, then you know God; and if not, then not!

Most of those who claim to be knowers (of God) make the knowledge of God dependent on the cessation of being and on the cessation of that cessation. That is an error and a clear oversight; the knowledge of God does not require either the cessation of being nor the cessation of that cessation, because things have no being and whatever has no being cannot cease to be, since cessation implies the prior existence of the thing that ceases to be. If you know yourself as not having being and (consequently) not ceasing to be, then you know God; and if not, then not!

By making the knowledge of God dependent on the cessation of being and the cessation of this cessation, there is an affirmation of polytheism. The Prophet said, “He who knows himself, knows his Lord”. He did not say, “He who ceases to be, knows his Lord”. The assertion of something other than God is incompatible with its cessation; or else this assertion is impossible, and it follows that its cessation is also impossible.

Your being is nothing and whatever is nothing cannot be placed in relationship to anything else, whether it is capable of cessation or not and whether it is existent or non-existent. The Prophet alluded to the fact that you are non-existent now as you were non-existent before creation, because now is Eternity-without-beginning and now is Eternity-without-end and now is Timelessness. God is the very being of Eternity-without-beginning, Eternity-without-end and Timelessness even though (in reality) there is no Eternity-without-beginning, Eternity-without-end nor Timelessness. If it were otherwise, He would not be alone, without anything being associated with Him, and it is necessary for Him to be alone without any associate. His associate would have being through its own essence, and not through the being of God. Then that associate would not need God and would therefore be a second Lord, which is impossible: God has no associate, nor equal, nor like.

For those engaged in The Work as presented on this site, click below for another translation of Ibn ‘Arabi’s text.

Another Translation

No one sees “X,” except “X;” no one reaches “X,” except “X;” and no one knows “X” except “X.” “X” knows “X” through “X” and “X” sees “X” by means of “X.” No one but “X” sees “X.” “X’s” very Oneness is “X” veil since nothing veils “X” other than “X;” “X’s” own Being veils “X.” “X’s” Oneness is concealed by “X’s” Oneness without any condition.

No one other than “X” sees “X.” No sent prophet, nor perfect saint nor angel brought close knows “X.” “X’s” prophet is “X;” “X’s” Messenger is “X;” “X’s” message is “X” and “X’s” word is “X.” “X” sent “X,” through “X,” from “X” to “X;” there is no intermediary or means other than “X.” There is no difference between the Sender, that which is sent and the one to whom it is sent. The very existence of the letters of the prophetic message is “X’s” existence. There is no other who could cease to be, or have a name or be named.

Because of this, the Prophet (may “X” bless him and give him peace) said, “He who knows himself, knows his Lord”. He also said, “I knew my Lord through my Lord”. What the Prophet meant by this, is that you are not you but you are “X” and there is no you; and it is not that “X” enters into you or comes out of you, or that you enter into “X” or come out of “X.” He did not mean that you have being and you are qualified by this or that attribute. What he meant was that you never were and that you never will be, whether through yourself, or through “X,” or in “X” or with “X.” You have neither ceased to be nor are you existent. You are “X” and “X” is you, without any of these imperfections. If you know your existence in this way, then you know “X;” and if not, then not!

Most of those who claim to be knowers (of “X”) make the knowledge of “X” dependent on the cessation of being and on the cessation of that cessation. That is an error and a clear oversight; the knowledge of “X” does not require either the cessation of being nor the cessation of that cessation, because things have no being and whatever has no being cannot cease to be, since cessation implies the prior existence of the thing that ceases to be. If you know yourself as not having being and (consequently) not ceasing to be, then you know “X;” and if not, then not!

By making the knowledge of “X” dependent on the cessation of being and the cessation of this cessation, there is an affirmation of polytheism. The Prophet said, “He who knows himself, knows his Lord”. He did not say, “He who ceases to be, knows his Lord”. The assertion of something other than “X” is incompatible with its cessation; or else this assertion is impossible, and it follows that its cessation is also impossible.

Your being is nothing and whatever is nothing cannot be placed in relationship to anything else, whether it is capable of cessation or not and whether it is existent or non-existent. The Prophet alluded to the fact that you are non-existent now as you were non-existent before creation, because now is Eternity-without-beginning and now is Eternity-without-end and now is Timelessness. “X” is the very being of Eternity-without-beginning, Eternity-without-end and Timelessness even though (in reality) there is no Eternity-without-beginning, Eternity-without-end nor Timelessness. If it were otherwise, “X” would not be alone, without anything being associated with “X,” and it is necessary for “X” to be alone without any associate. “X’s” associate would have being through its own essence, and not through the being of “X.” Then that associate would not need “X” and would therefore be a second Lord, which is impossible: “X” has no associate, nor equal, nor like.

0 comment
FacebookTwitterPinterestTumblrEmail
Newer Posts